Three WhitesHR

Research

Short summaries of strength training research, written for coaches. Each says how strong the evidence is and lists its PubMed studies, including those that disagree with the claim.

RPE and proximity to failure

Volume, frequency and periodization

  • Each extra weekly set adds less

    Strength rises with the number of hard sets per week, but each extra set adds less than the one before.

    Strong evidence · 5 PubMed sources

  • Frequency works by spreading volume

    Training a lift two to four times a week works mainly by spreading the same weekly volume over more sessions. With volume equal, extra sessions add little strength.

    Limited evidence · 5 PubMed sources

  • One hard set still builds strength

    One hard set per exercise, one to three times a week, still raises 1RM in trained men. More sets give a somewhat larger gain.

    Strong evidence · 2 PubMed sources

  • Periodization gives a small edge

    Periodized programs build slightly more 1RM than non-periodized ones. The advantage is small.

    Strong evidence · 5 PubMed sources

Load, rest and beginners

How to read the grade

Strong evidence
At least one research synthesis (a meta-analysis or systematic review) supports the claim, and none of comparable weight contradicts it.
Moderate evidence
At least two independent randomised trials support the claim, none contradicts it or is inconclusive, and there is no research synthesis yet.
Limited evidence
Research supports the claim, but there is little of it or the studies disagree.

We count resistance training research from PubMed, in the population the claim is about: syntheses (meta-analyses and systematic reviews), randomised trials and other studies. Practitioner opinion is not counted. The summaries are ours; open the original for numbers and detail.

Three Whites is a tool for powerlifting coaches: the powerlifter logs sets, AI drafts the week, the coach decides. Beta for coaches